If you want to learn more, please visit our website Sanyuanjiuqi.
It is also critical in biological energy transfer processes that are vital for life and growth. Adequate phosphorus results in higher grain production, improved crop quality, greater stalk strength, increased root growth, and earlier crop maturity. For over one hundred years, phosphorus has been applied to crops as fertilizer--first as ground bone and now as some chemical reaction product of ground rock. Yet, for all that experience, its management cannot be taken for granted.
Phosphorus is not lost into the atmosphere--rarely does it leach beyond the reach of roots--and its availability to crops can be accurately estimated by soil testing. The challenge is that phosphorus is a macronutrient in plants but behaves somewhat like a micronutrient in soils. The concentration of soluble phosphate in the soil solution is very low, and phosphorus is relatively immobile in the soil. That is important because crops take up phosphorus only from the soil solution. The crop depends on replenishment of the soil solution with phosphate from the other forms existing in the soil. The rate of replenishment, which determines the availability of phosphorus, is related to soil pH, phosphorus levels in soil, its fixation by the soil, and placement of added phosphorus. The crop manager must deal with each of these factors to avoid crop phosphorus deficiency. Phosphorus deficiency symptoms include reduced growth and yield, delayed maturity, and generally purple coloring along the edge of the lower plant leaves, especially on younger plants.
In addition, the manager needs to consider possible "side effects" of crop production; specifically, nutrient pollution of streams or other surface water near crop fields. Water can be polluted with phosphorus primarily as a result of erosion and runoff of phosphorus in the soil or phosphorus applied either from fertilizer or manure. The amount of phosphorus lost due to runoff of manure, fertilizer, or soil may be relatively small as far as fertilizer costs are concerned. However, these small losses may have serious effects on the quality of water. The main problem with phosphorus pollution is eutrophication resulting in excessive growth of plants and algae in the water. This can seriously limit the use of the water for drinking, industry, fishing, or recreation. Pollution reduction may not be simply a direct economic problem for the farmer, but a responsibility that extends beyond the farm fence. For more information see the Penn State publication "Agricultural Phosphorus and the Environment."
In general, crop use of any nutrient depends on a two-step process: soil supply of that nutrient in an available form, and uptake of that available nutrient by the crop. There are certain constants involved that the crop manager cannot change. Selecting among the options presented by nature constitutes management.
Figure 1 shows an overview of the behavior of phosphorus in the soil. The soil solution is the key to plant nutrition because all phosphorus that is taken up by plants comes from phosphorus dissolved in the soil solution. Because the amount of soluble phosphorus in the soil solution is very low, it must be replenished by as many as 500 times during a growing season to meet the nutritional needs of a typical crop. Although very little phosphorus is in the soil solution at any time, there is a large amount of phosphorus in most soils. The bulk of the soil phosphorus is either in the soil organic matter or in the soil minerals. A large proportion of the phosphorus in both of these fractions is in very stable, unavailable forms, while a much smaller proportion is in available forms that can dissolve in the soil solution and be taken up by plants. The dynamic and available phosphorus phosphorus in these fractions, such as phosphorus added in fertilizer or manure, can be quickly fixed into stable, unavailable forms in the soil. This is why, even with optimum management, the efficiency of plant uptake of phosphorus is very low--usually less than 20 percent. At the same time as the soil solution phosphorus is depleted by crop uptake, unavailable phosphorus can slowly be released to more available forms to replenish the soil solution. This slow release can sustain plant growth in many natural systems, but is usually not rapid enough to maintain adequate phosphorus availability in intensively managed cropping systems without some supplemental phosphorus in the form of fertilizer, manure, or crop residues.
Figure 1. Behavior of phosphorus in the soil-plant system.
Organic phosphorus availability depends on microbial activity to breakdown the organic matter and release this phosphorus into available forms. Thus, availability of organic phosphorus is very dependent on conditions in the soil and on the weather, which influence microbial activity. The mineralization of organic phosphorus to inorganic forms is favored by optimum soil pH and nutrient levels, good soil physical properties, and warm moist conditions. The inorganic phosphorus is bound with varying adhesiveness to iron and aluminum compounds in the soil. Replenishment of the soil solution with phosphate from inorganic forms comes from slow dissolution of these minerals. The solubilities of the compounds holding phosphorus are directly related to the soil pH. The pH range of greatest phosphorus availability is 6.0 to 7.0. At a lower pH, when the soil is very acidic, more iron and aluminum are available to form insoluble phosphate compounds and, therefore, less phosphate is available. At very high pH, phosphorus can react with excess calcium to also form unavailable compounds in the soil.
Crop response to phosphorus depends on the availability of phosphorus in the soil solution and the ability of the crop to take up phosphorus. The availability of phosphorus in the soil solution has already been discussed. The ability of a plant to take up phosphorus is largely due to its root distribution relative to phosphorus location in soil. Because phosphorus is very immobile in the soil, it does not move very far in the soil to get to the roots. Diffusion to the root is only about 1/8 of an inch per year, and relatively little phosphorus in soil is within that distance of a root. Thus, the roots must grow through the soil and basically go get the phosphorus the plant needs. Therefore root growth is very important to phosphorus nutrition. Any factor that affects root growth will affect the ability of plant to explore more soil and get adequate phosphorus. Soil compaction, herbicide root injury, and insects feeding on roots can all dramatically reduce the ability of the plant to get adequate phosphorus. Young seedlings can suffer from phosphorus deficiency even in soils with high available phosphorus levels because they have very limited root systems that are growing very slowly in cold, wet, early early-season soil conditions. This is why some crops respond to phosphorus applied at planting in starter fertilizers even in relatively high phosphorus soils. (Starter fertilizer management is discussed later in this fact sheet. See also Starter Fertilizer.)
The availability of phosphorus to crops is more than just having phosphorus in the soil. It will depend on soil pH, how supplemental phosphorus is applied, crop root growth, and the other management factors that influence root growth.
The most important tool in phosphorus management for crops is a soil test. Soil testing reveals soil pH, the soil phosphorus level, and determines the recommended application amount of phosphorus for the crop to be grown. Consistent and representative soil sampling is very important for correct interpretation of soil test results. Take as many cores as practical. Sampling depth is extremely important for both pH and phosphorus, especially in reduce and no-tillage systems where there is little or no mixing to homogenize the soil. In Pennsylvania, the recommendation is to sample to "plow depth," even in no-till fields where phosphorus is concentrated within several inches of the soil surface.
There is no specific "available" fraction of phosphorus in soils. The available phosphorus is what is in solution plus what can be expected to become soluble from minerals and organic matter over the growing season. Therefore, soil tests cannot extract the exact available amount from the soil, but rather an amount that reflects what might become available. Research on Pennsylvania soils is then used to interpret the amount extracted by the soil test in terms of what is required for optimum crop production. This research has shown that on our soils, if the Mehlich 3 soil test used, in Pennsylvania extracts between 30 and 50 parts per million (ppm) phosphorus it is optimum for production of agronomic crops. Below 30 ppm phosphorus, additional phosphorus must be applied to build up the soil for optimum crop production. Above 50 ppm phosphorus, there will be no benefit to adding additional phosphorus. In some cases, applying a small amount of phosphorus as a starter on soils testing above 50 ppm may be beneficial. In the optimum range range--between 30 and 50 ppm phosphorus--phosphorus is often recommended to offset crop removal (Table 1) and thus maintain the soil in the optimum range over time. Current phosphorus recommendations for agronomic crops in Pennsylvania can be found on the Agricultural Analytical Services Laboratory Web site.
Table 1. Typical crop nutrient removal for phosphorus. Crop165% moisture.
2For legume-grass mixtures, use the predominant species in the mixture.
310% moisture.
4Includes straw.
The common phosphorus fertilizers, their sources, and some important properties are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Description of common phosphorus fertilizer materials. Material Analysis Comments Calcium orthophosphates Manufactured by treating rock phosphate with acid Ordinary superphosphate 20% P2O5, 90% water soluble, 8-10% sulfur Not used anymore in commercial crop production. Replaced by triple superphosphate Triple superphosphate 46% P2O5, 95% water soluble, no sulfur Common material used in no-nitrogen blends Ammonium phosphates Manufactured by reacting anhydrous ammonia with phosphoric acid Monoammonium phosphate MAP 52% P2O5, 11% N, 100% water soluble Very high phosphorus analysis. Excellent material for use in starter fertilizer Diammonium phosphate DAP 46% P2O5, 18% N, 100% water soluble Most common phosphorus fertilizer. Used extensively as the basis for blended fertilizers Ammonium polyphosphate Solid: 55% P2O5, 11% NBy Pennsylvania law, mineral phosphorus materials sold as fertilizer must be labeled with the percentage "available phosphoric acid", which is defined as the amount of fertilizer phosphorus that dissolves in neutral ammonium citrate. This analysis must be given as a percent P2O5/A) in the material. Fertilizers do not really contain any P2O5/A) but this expression is a carryover from past analytical methods. Fertilizer recommendations are also given as pounds of P2O5/A) per acre and are based on the amount of this "available phosphoric acid" that should be available to the crop over the period of the growing season. Mineral phosphorus materials that have not been reacted with acid, such as raw rock phosphate and basic slag materials, must also be labeled with the total P equivalent and the material's degree of fineness. The phosphate availability of phosphorus materials that have not been reacted with acid is low, as the availability then depends on reaction in acidic soil, particle size determines the speed of that reaction. Bone and other natural organic phosphate materials must be labeled only with the total P content. Don't confuse total P with available P--the availability of phosphorus in these forms depends on the mineralization, or breakdown, of the material by bacteria in soil and cannot be guaranteed.
Immediate phosphorus availability can be defined by the percentage of the available P that is water-soluble. This is not a labeling requirement, but it is described for various materials in Table 2. A high percentage of water solubility is important for short-season, fast-growing crops, crops with a restricted root system, crops receiving a starter fertilizer application, and crops grown in a low phosphorus soil where less than optimum rates of phosphorus are applied. Where the importance of high water solubility, or quick reaction in the soil, is not so great (such as in fertilizing a permanent pasture or where soil phosphorus levels are already optimum), a more economical form of phosphorus can be applied. Most of the common phosphorus fertilizer materials are highly water soluble (Table 2).
Although the calcium orthophosphate fertilizers are manufactured by reaction with an acid, they do not acidify the soil. The ammonium phosphates and the ammoniated superphosphates, on the other hand, do ultimately have an acidic effect on soil because of the ammonium nitrogen that they contain--not because of their phosphate content.
The physical form of the applied phosphorus does not make any difference to the plant if the materials have similar chemical properties. The same reactions eventually occur in soil whether liquid or solid fertilizer is applied. Though all of the phosphorus in true solution fertilizer will be water soluble, the same materials applied in dry form are just as efficient.
Average manure phosphorus values for various animal types are shown in Table 3, but however good the averages are, the manure phosphorus content on individual farms may vary considerably from the average. The true value can only be known by manure analysis.
Table 3. Average manure P analyses. (Actual analyses vary considerably from farm to farm. Manure analysis is strongly recommended.) Dairy Lactating cows 4 lb/ton or 13 lbs/ gal Dry cows 3 lb/ton Calves and heifers 2 lb/ton Poultry Broilers 75 lb/ton Layers 55 lb/ton Turkeys 80 lb/ton Swine Gestation 35 lb/ gal. Lactation 20 lb/ gal. Nursery 40 lb/ gal. Farrow to feeder 35 lb/ gal. Grow finish 55 lb/ gal.Phosphorus in animal wastes is generally less water-soluble than fertilizer phosphorus. However, over a normal growing season the availability of manure phosphorus is usually similar to fertilizer phosphorus and can be substituted on a 1 to 1 basis. Even so, manure is not a substitute for starter fertilizer because it ordinarily has a lower water-soluble phosphorus content. As long as physical losses do not occur, handling or application methods do not affect phosphorus content or availability.
Figure 2. Imbalance between crop nutrient requirement and manure nutrient content.
Phosphorus from manure applications can be a potential pollutant. There are several reasons for this. First, as livestock and poultry farms have become more intensive, greater amounts of feed are imported onto the farms resulting in accumulation of excess nutrients in manure beyond what can be used by the crops on the farm. Even when there is no overall excess of nutrients on the farm, application of manure nutrients is commonly done based on meeting the nitrogen requirement of the crop with the nitrogen content of the manure. Since the relative amounts of nutrients required by crops is different from the relative amounts contained in most manures, there will usually be an excess of phosphorus and potassium (K) applied in this system. This is illustrated with corn and dairy manure in Figure 2. Notice that when manure is applied to exactly match the available nitrogen--requirement of the crop, almost twice as much phosphorus is applied as is required by the corn crop. The relative differences will vary with different crops and manures but a similar trend will be observed.
Ultimately we need to move toward a better overall balance that minimizes the application of excess nutrients. In the meantime, management strategies are being developed to help farmers make decisions about when, where, and how to apply their manure to maximize the agronomic and economic benefits from the manure nutrients and minimize the potential environmental impact. Since the major losses of phosphorus from fields is through runoff and erosion, best management practices that reduce these processes can be very helpful in minimizing the environmental impact of the excess phosphorus that is applied. An important tool in making these management decisions is the Phosphorus Index, which helps evaluate the sources of phosphorus and the potential transport of phosphorus from the farm fields to give an indication of the risk of phosphorus pollution and to guide improved management. For more information see the Penn State publication "Agricultural Phosphorus and the Environment."
Finally, there are interactions between phosphorus and other nutrients that can affect crop production. When the ratio of phosphorus to zinc (Zn) in a soil becomes excessively high, a phosphorus-induced Zn deficiency may result that can limit yield. However, few cases of Zn deficiency are found in Pennsylvania in spite of many corn fields testing high or excessive in phosphorus. Manure application that results in soil phosphorus buildup also contributes Zn to the soil. Therefore, phosphorus-induced Zn deficiency is usually only seen when excessive soil phosphorus levels are due to phosphorus fertilizer and not to manure application. Often when there is concern about zinc deficiency, farmers will add zinc to the banded fertilizer, which usually also contains a high level of phosphorus. This practice will likely reduce the effectiveness of the added zinc. A more efficient approach is to broadcast zinc every few years on soils that are known to respond to added zinc.
Because of phosphorus immobility and soil fixation, placement of fertilizer phosphorus can affect its availability to plants. Fertilizer that is broadcast and plowed down is mixed uniformly with a large amount of soil. Thus, the probability of root contact with the fertilizer is maximized. At the same time, though, added fertilizer is in greater contact with absorbing surfaces in the soil, thereby increasing phosphorus fixation. When the fertilizer is applied as a concentrated band, contact with the soil--and thus fixation--is minimized. However, lack of phosphorus movement from point of placement also means that the number of roots in contact with the fertilizer may be less then when broadcast and plowed down. The greater the ability of the soil to fix phosphorus, the greater the importance in overriding the fixation capacity with a concentrated band. Crop response to fertilizer phosphorus placement is further complicated by crop root characteristics, soil phosphorus levels, and soil temperature.
Placement limitations imposed by sod crops and no-till culture often result in an accumulation of nutrients near the soil surface (Figure 3). Provided proper residue management is practiced, corn root distribution appears to respond to differences in soil moisture and nutrient location in no-till culture with greater root density within the surface 6 inches of soil (Figure 3). Nutrient uptake of surface-applied fertilizer equals or exceeds uptake under conventional till management.
Figure 3. Distribution of soil test (Bray I extractable) phosphorus after two years of different tillage practice and rooting pattern in conventional and no-till corn. (Source: J. K. Hall, The Pennsylvania State University)
The answer to this question depends mostly on the soil phosphorus status. On soils with optimum to high levels of phosphorus, banding has less advantage and broadcast applications are generally adequate (sometimes superior to banding). Row crops in general, and corn in particular, appear to yield better when soils contain relatively high levels of phosphorus throughout the rooting profile. In tests with the recommended phosphorus application split between band and broadcast, versus all by one method, the maximum yields have been obtained with a combination. The advantage to building up the general soil level of phosphorus is probably due to the need of all roots to take up some phosphorus; while banding near the seed can reduce fixation and increase uptake early in the season.
Small grains, on the other hand, have limited rooting systems and thus less capacity to explore soil. In addition, they are short-season crops and often grown in cooler temperatures. Therefore, phosphorus placement seems more critical for small grains than for row crops and perennials. Greater yield response to banded phosphorus is common, especially on low phosphorus soils or soils with a greater ability to fix phosphorus. Recommendations of incorporated broadcast phosphorus for small grains have frequently been higher than if the phosphorus were banded, because higher soil phosphorus levels compensate for reduced phosphorus uptake ability of the crop. Where soils are built up to optimum or above phosphorus levels, however, banded or broadcast-P can be equally effective.
Starter fertilizer is a specific band application at a specific time. Even if you are planning to broadcast the majority of the required phosphorus as fertilizer or manure, a banded starter application may be important for spring-planted crops, particularly corn. Limited root growth -- combined with cold and wet soils early in the season, especially in notill fields -- reduces the availability of phosphorus and the plant's uptake ability. Early plant vigor, and final yield, are often improved by starter phosphorus applied close to seedling roots, even when soil phosphorus levels are high or when manure has been applied. Phosphate applied in combination with ammonium-N results in greater phosphorus uptake. Phosphorus itself has a low salt effect and may be placed close to the seed. However, if applied with N and K the rate should be limited so as to supply no more than 70 pounds total of N plus K2O if placed 2 by 2 inches from the seed. High water solubility of the starter phosphorus source is important, and the ammonium phosphates meet that criteria as well as supplying N. However, diammonium phosphate (DAP) reacts with soil water to produce ammonia, that which can be toxic to seedling roots. Therefore, the rate of DAP used as a starter source of N and P should be kept low and placement should be at least 2 inches from the seed to be safe.
The best time to think about starter fertilizer for alfalfa establishment is in the years before rotating a field to alfalfa. Yield response to starter fertilizer is most likely when the alfalfa seedlings will be stressed by low fertility level or by adverse soil or moisture conditions. High soil phosphorus level is required by the forage, so plan ahead by building phosphorus levels into the optimum range during the last year of corn, and soil test in the fall prior to alfalfa establishment. If fertility is optimum by planting time, starter fertilization can usually be omitted. See Starter Fertilizer for more detail.
Crop phosphorus nutrition depends on the ability of the soil to replenish the soil solution with phosphorus as the crop removes it and on the ability of the plant to produce a healthy and extensive root system that has access to the maximum amount of soil phosphorus. There are many good fertilizer sources of phosphorus, and manure is an excellent source of phosphorus for crops. Application of fertilizer and manure must be done to maximize the chemical and physical availability of the phosphorus to crops while minimizing the risk that the phosphorus might be lost to the environment by runoff or erosion. Conservation best management practices are critical to good phosphorus management.
Prepared by Douglas B. Beegle, professor of agronomy, and Philip T. Durst, former extension associate.
Want more information on phosphorus in plants? Feel free to contact us.
Last updated: 04-07-
Share to:
In the quest for sustainable agriculture, phosphorus fertilizers stand at the forefront of both challenge and opportunity. This vital nutrient, indispensable for plant development, requires careful management to maximize its benefits while minimizing its environmental impact. To help farmers, food producers, and input suppliers achieve better crop yields and healthier soil, we&#;ve compiled this detailed guide to phosphorus fertilization. We&#;ll explore the advantages and disadvantages of various phosphorus-based fertilizers, examine the best ways to apply them, and introduce innovative tools that skyrocket fertilization efficiency in agricultural fields across the globe.
Phosphorus fertilizer is a nutrient-rich product that plays a crucial role in modern agriculture, supplying one of the three macronutrients essential for plant growth. As rain constantly washes phosphorus (P) from the soil, farmers rely on organic or synthetic fertilizers to replenish depleted reserves.
Phosphorus drives key plant processes like energy and nutrient transport, photosynthesis, and cell division. Thus, when applied correctly, phosphorus-rich fertilizers boost the availability of this vital nutrient for crops, enhancing their growth and productivity. The most prominent benefits of using phosphorus fertilizers are:
However, overuse can lead to runoff, potentially causing environmental issues. Balancing the agricultural application of phosphorus fertilizer is essential to maximizing crop yields while minimizing ecological impact.
Identifying phosphorus deficiency is tricky, as plants often show no obvious symptoms beyond early growth stunting. So, by the time nutrient deficiency is apparent in annual crops, it may be too late to fix it. Some plants, though, show an abnormal purplish discoloration of leaves and stems, which helps farmers timely intervene with phosphorus-containing fertilizer applications.
Phosphorus moves easily within plants, shifting to young growth areas and later to fruiting parts. It&#;s critical for seed and fruit formation, with late-season deficiencies significantly affecting crop maturity. Later in the growing season, plants need more phosphorus than other nutrients.
Soil moisture greatly influences P availability. Before fertilizing, check soil moisture levels across fields. Remote sensing tools such as EOSDA Crop Monitoring allow for large-scale moisture assessment without the need for ground sensors. Use this data alongside precipitation information on our platform to optimize phosphorus fertilizer application. Timely detection and management of phosphorus deficiencies are key to ensuring healthy crop development and maximizing harvest potential.
Soil moisture analytics help avoid nutrient deficiencies.
Performing fields analytics based on relevant satellite data to ensure effective decision-making!
try nowEffective phosphorus management requires a strategic approach to fertilizer selection. Seasoned crop producers carefully evaluate their unique farming context, considering soil characteristics, crop requirements, and environmental variables. Understanding various phosphorus-containing fertilizer options, including their strengths and potential drawbacks, enables farmers to implement tailored nutrient management plans that optimize crop yields.
Organic phosphorus, primarily sourced from animal husbandry and urban environments, provides more than just nutrients. These natural phosphorus fertilizers play a crucial role in fostering soil vitality and supporting sustainable agricultural practices.
Bone meal is prized for its slow-release phosphorus, which is particularly beneficial for perennials and root vegetables. However, it presents several challenges: variable nutrient percentage, higher costs compared to synthetic phosphate fertilizers, and potential calcium overload in soils. Availability issues and slow decomposition rates in certain soil and environmental conditions can further complicate its use. Despite these drawbacks, bone meal remains a valuable input in organic farming. Its benefits in phosphorus-deficient soils and suitability for long-term crops make it a popular choice for those prioritizing sustainable agricultural methods.
Fish meal, a gradually released fertilizer with phosphorus, also offers a rich source of organic matter, promoting soil fertility and supporting the growth of leafy greens and fruit-bearing crops. However, fish meal poses several challenges: sustainability concerns related to its production, a rank odor during application, limited availability in some growing zones, and the threat of soil contamination with heavy metals. These factors necessitate careful consideration when using fish meal as a source of phosphorus. Despite these issues, it remains a valuable organic fertilizing option for enhancing soil health and plant nutrition when used responsibly and with awareness of its limitations.
Compost provides sustained nutrient release, benefiting plants while recycling organic matter. It improves soil microbiome health, stabilizes pH, and enhances water retention. Unlike concentrated granular phosphorus fertilizers, compost rarely causes overfertilization. These qualities are particularly valuable in water-scarce regions.
However, compost&#;s variable nutrient content can complicate precise fertilization. The slow-release nature, while generally advantageous, may not suit crops requiring rapid nutrient uptake during critical growth stages. Nevertheless, compost remains an essential component in sustainable farming practices, offering multiple soil health benefits beyond mere nutrient provision.
Rock phosphate serves as an organic source of phosphorus and trace elements, slowly releasing nutrients over time. It is effective for long-term soil enrichment, especially in phosphorus-deficient regions like South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. However, rock phosphate fertilizer won&#;t provide a rapid nutrient response for crops since its effectiveness relies on soil microbial activity to convert insoluble phosphorus into plant-available forms.
Farmers might require larger quantities of rock phosphate applied due to its lower P content compared to synthetic fertilizers. This mineral is unsuitable for acidic soils, so you&#;ll need to conduct pH testing before application. It&#;s also important to consider environmental concerns associated with mineral mining, which highlight the need for sustainable practices in its production and use.
The agricultural sector has shifted away from raw rock phosphate, despite it being the natural source material for synthetic phosphorus fertilizers. This transition is dictated primarily by rock phosphate&#;s low phosphorous content and limited cropresponse Understanding phosphorus fertilizers. (). University of Minnesota Extension..Instead, farmers increasingly favor well-refined inorganic phosphate fertilizers, which provide more consistent and substantial crop yields.
Single superphosphate, the first commercial fertilizer for treating phosphorus deficiency, marked the beginning of modern agricultural phosphorus-rich inputs. While it contains a relatively low percentage of phosphorus, SSP paved the way for more concentrated formulations. Today, the agricultural landscape has shifted, with triple superphosphate now dominating the market due to its higher P concentration.
Double superphosphate is a moderate-strength phosphorus fertilizer, delivering twice the phosphorous punch of a single superphosphate while maintaining similar traits in appearance and function. DSP production resembles that of triple superphosphate, with the key difference being the concentration of phosphoric acid used on phosphate rock. Double superphosphate offers farmers a middle ground between single and triple superphosphate options.
Triple superphosphate emerged as a pioneering high-analysis P fertilizing product in the 20thcentury McLaughlin, M. Technical Bulletin: Main characteristics and agronomic performance of triple superphosphate. Fertiliser Technology Research Centre The University of Adelaide.. With more than three times the phosphorous content of a single superphosphate, TSP is a concentrated source of this essential nutrient. Unlike its single counterpart, TSP contains only phosphorous, excluding sulfur, which can add to soil acidification.
Triple superphosphate is versatile enough for use in soils ranging from slightly acidic to alkaline. As an example of a slow-release phosphorus fertilizer, TSP is typically applied during autumn fertilization for long-term nutrient provision throughout the growing season.
For years, farmers have relied on monoammonium phosphate, a nutrient-rich phosphorus fertilizer, to boost crop yields. These fast-acting, water-soluble phosphorus fertilizer granules rapidly dissolve in damp soil, separating into ammonium and phosphate &#; key components for healthy plant development. While MAP&#;s dual-nutrient nature makes it an efficient fertilizer, it comes with challenges. Farmers should be aware of potential soil salinity and fertilizer volatilization issues, particularly in alkaline soil conditions.
Diammonium phosphate reigns supreme as the most commonly used phosphorus fertilizer. Its superior physical qualities and high nutrient content are the main reasons for its popularity Nadarajan, S., Sukumaran, S. Chapter 12 - Chemistry and toxicology behind chemical fertilizers. In: Lewu, F. et al. (Eds.). Controlled Release Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture, , 195-229. https://doi.org/10./B978-0-12--0.-1.. Many fruits, vegetables, and grains benefit from DAP because of the powerful combination of phosphorus and nitrogen it supplies.
However, while DAP boasts higher solubility than monoammonium phosphate, it can elevate soil pH locally. This characteristic requires careful management, particularly in alkaline soils, to prevent potential issues with plant germination and nutrient availability. Additionally, surface-applied diammonium phosphate fertilizer carries a higher risk of nitrogen loss compared to its monoammonium counterpart.
Phosphorus fertilizers differ in how quickly they act. Consequently, we can classify them into several categories:
Phosphorus fertilizers are prone to runoff, which is a significant environmental concern. To mitigate this, proper application methods, timing, and amounts are crucial.
Optimizing phosphate fertilizer application requires careful timing to minimize runoff risks. Avoid applying P when heavy precipitation is forecasted within 48 hours or on frosted, snow-covered, or water-soaked soil. These conditions significantly increase the likelihood of P loss via runoff.
To support precise fertilizer management, EOSDA Crop Monitoring offers detailed weather forecasts for up to 14 days. This tool provides hourly predictions for key weather parameters like temperature, precipitation, humidity, wind speed, and evapotranspiration. By integrating weather data into field activity planning, crop producers using our precision agriculture platform can identify ideal windows to use phosphorus fertilizer. This holistic approach enables data-driven decisions that balance agronomic needs with environmental stewardship.
Weather forecasts are useful for determining the optimal fertilization timing.Apply phosphorus-based fertilizers either below the soil&#;s surface or work them into the soil whenever possible. Applying inorganic phosphate fertilizers in bands, such as 2 inches (5 cm) above and 2 inches (5 cm) below the seed, allows for more fertilizer-to-seed contact and greater plant availability with lower rates than broadcast applications. In pasture or zero-till systems, where broadcast applications are usually the only solution, they should be scheduled according to our previous anti-runoff advice.
For liquids and slurries, it&#;s also best to inject or apply them subsurface. This is facilitated by a variety of tools, even in pasture or zero-till settings. When applying liquid phosphorus fertilizers through fertigation systems, ensure sufficient infiltration so that there is no accumulation or runoff.
To optimize the P application, leverage historical field productivity data. EOSDA Crop Monitoring analyzes satellite imagery from previous growing seasons and identifies zones of high and low vegetation to generate variable-rate application (VRA) maps. These maps can be exported and uploaded to agricultural machinery for precise, variable-rate fertilization, ensuring efficient phosphorus and potassium use across the field.
Planning phosphorus and potassium fertilization with the help of EOSDA Crop Monitoring.As our understanding of soil properties and plant nutrition evolves, so must our fertilization practices. The shift toward more precise, targeted phosphorus applications represents a significant step forward in agricultural efficiency. By combining traditional knowledge with modern tools like satellite imagery analysis and variable-rate application maps, farmers can fine-tune their phosphorus fertilizer strategies, paving the way for a more sustainable and productive future in farming.
Published: 04.07.Vasyl Cherlinka
Scientist at EOS Data Analytics
Vasyl Cherlinka is a Doctor of Biosciences specializing in pedology (soil science), with 30 years of experience in the field. He attended the engineering college in Ukraine and received his degree in agrochemistry, agronomy and soil science in the Chernivtsi National University. Since , Dr. Cherlinka has been advising EOSDA on problems in soil science, agronomy, and agrochemistry.
For more npk 20-20-20 fertilizerinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.