Pressure filtration takes place in closed chambers. Unlike the belt filter system, sludge is compelled to undergo the stress applied (creep is not possible).
This relatively old technique is still widely used. Its major advantage, one that is often the basis for decisions, is the production of a cake qualified as «solid» and, therefore, usually containing over 30 % DM (thus, the highest dry solids content for mechanical dewatering).Nevertheless, its drawbacks are significant:
However, some progress has been achieved over recent years:
A filter consists of an array of vertical, recessedplates (1) that are juxtaposed and held firmly together by a moving head (8) actuated by one or more hydraulic cylinders (2) positioned at one end of the array. The thrust developed by the moving head/plates assembly is contained by a fixed head (9) positioned at the other end.
This vertical plate arrangement forms closed filtration chambers (3), and facilitate the use of mechanised means for dropping off the cakes («discharging»).
Fairly small mesh (10 to 300 mm) filter cloths (4) are placed on the two grooved sides of the plates.
The sludge to be filtered (5) is pumped into the filtration chambers through openings (6) that are usually located in the centre of the plates; the alignment formed by these holes constitutes the sludge feed pipe.
Solid matters gradually accumulates in the filtration chamber until the final compacted cake is formed.
The filtrate is collected in the grooves of the plate, behind the filter cloths, and removed through internal pipes (7) (therefore, without any external nuisance).
The pressure generated by the clamping cylinder(s) must be calculated so that the sealing pressure applied on the joint face of each filter plate exceeds the chambers internal pressure developed by the sludge pumping system
Their main difference is as follows:
Multi-filament, closer textured cloths are used for very fine hydroxide sludge.
In a well-operated unit, cloths will have a working life in excess of cycles.
The filter press works using a series of pressings. Each pressing comprises the following phases:
BRIGHT supply professional and honest service.
In addition to these four filtration cycle phases, there is the extremely important cleaning phase: cleaning the cloths and behind the filtrate discharge grooves. This wash is carried out every 10-15 cycles when polymer conditioning is used and every 30-40 cycles in the case of mineral conditioning. Washers (photo 16) can operate unmanned on the larger units. Washers are synchronised on plate hauling. A wash takes approximately 2-3 hours. When massive lime conditioning is used, cloths and plates have to be descaled approximately every 500 cycles: usually by soaking or circulating a passivated HC solution having a 5-7 % tilrated.
The filter press consumes relatively few energy: approximately 25 to 35 kWh · t1 suspended solids depending on sludge type.
Click here to create your account in order to view the illustrationsPhoto 25. Filter press washer - Drinking water sludge (Moulle-Dunkerque France)We need to know:
A filter press is dimensioned by the total capacity VT of its filtration chambers:
where:
M in kg suspended solids · d1
SF as a fraction (= 100 SF as the %/ DS).
An economic compromise can then be reached between the number of cakes and the plate size range.
N.B. the filter press is the mechanical dewatering appliance that produces the best separation performance (approximately 98-99%).
Table 22 provides an overview of performances obtained with some hydrophobic sludges (no conditioning), a few mineral tendency hydrophilic sludges (conditioned using lime only) and a few organic tendency hydrophilic sludges (conditioned using both ferric salts and lime).
Click here to create your account in order to view the illustrationsTable 22. Examples of filter press performance with mineral conditioningFigure 41 is a diagram of a filtration system representing the above application.
Click here to create your account in order to view the illustrationsFigure 41. WWTP plant. Schematic diagram of a filter press with mineral conditioningPolymer conditioning is an attractive option because there is no increase in waste tonnage (unlike mineral conditioning that often requires the addition of large amounts of lime).On the other hand, most sludge types produce a more or less sticky cake which increases frame opening time and manual assistance for detaching the cake.
Ferric chloride must be used in conjunction with polymer on organic sludge in order to reduce this adhesion.
In view of the fact there is no added mineral loading, dry solids contents obtained are certainly lower and the cake will have a spongier structure.
Table 23 provides some performance figures for sewage residual sludge.
Figures 42, 43 and 44 provide several examples of the application of polymer conditioning in a filter-press unit.
Click here to create your account in order to view the illustrationsTable 23. WWTP sludge treated on filter press with polymer conditioningCombined conditioning systems (mineral with lime or polymer figure 42) are very interesting: in effect, lime treatment satisfies agricultural requirements in terms of final disposal. When this final disposal become impossible or poses problems, polymer conditioning allows the sludge to be routed to thermal drying or incineration while maintaining acceptable dry solids contents and, therefore, maximum net calorific value.
Click here to create your account in order to view the illustrationsFigure 42. Filter press unit with polymer. Remiremont (France) WWTP (40,000 p.e.)Click here to create your account in order to view the illustrationsFigure 43. Filter press unit with in-line combined conditioningClick here to create your account in order to view the illustrationsFigure 44. Filter press unit with polymer only. In-line flocculation, HP pump downstream